Entries Tagged as ''

Huelva 2007 was a smashing success

A hearty thank-you to everyone who helped to make Huelva 2007 the success that it was — speakers, attendees, volunteers, UHU and VALDOCCO staff and directors. I especially want to thank our blog volunteers for the hours of work that went into this event. Many behind-the scenes tasks were also taken care of by CAENTI members.

We are already planning next year’s conference to be held in Besançon in october 2008. Stay tuned as we set the specific blog for Besançon 2008. We hope to see you there!

A big thank you goes out to all the people who made Huelva 2007 such an exciting event. Come see the Huelva 2007 teams at:
http://www.territorial-intelligence.eu/huelva2007/blog/?page_id=83

Day 26, Plenary Debate: Relationships within AR

 The debate named “Universities – Territorial Actors Relationship within the Framework of Action-Research: Potentialities and Limits” was moderated by Prof. Dr. Manuela A. De Paz Báñez. She organised the debate giving a brief speech about the conceptualisation, roles and relationships between territorial actors and university researchers within the framework of Action-Research (AR). Differences between traditional research and Durable Participative Collaborative AR have been detailed regarding to epistemological changes and different relationships between territorial actor and research actor. Some recommendations were given to improve relationships within the framework of participative AR.

Dr. De Paz provided participants with documents related to the issues treated in her speech. Few minutes were given to personal reflexion and writing notes in our papers. Debate was very animated due to the interesting contributions of participants, deeping in contents presented by the chair and coming with new ideas and aspects to be considered. Some of these contributions were related to think also in terms of the process or evolution from traditional research and participative AR. Some of the questions that arose were: How do we get to the aspects involved by AR? What are the obstacles to be overcome? Other issues were related to the importance of innovation within the process or the way policy is considered. Definition of every actor may be defined. Fears between different actors (including researchers) and financial issues were also pointed out.

Plenary debate “New Technologies and Information Treatment within the Framework of Research- Action: Ethical and Organizational Problems”, moderated by Dr. C. MASSELOT

Plenary debate “Universities – Territorial Actors Relationship within the Framework of Research- Action: Potentialities and Limits”, moderated by Prof. Dr. M. A. DE PAZ BÁÑEZ

Day 26 final program

The Second International Annual Conference is coming to the end. This afternoon will close with two Plenary Debates. Both operate within the Framework of Research-Action. The first began to hold at 15.30, content to treat deals Potentialities and Limits in the Universities- Territorial Actors Relationship. The second, and final, debate will be about Ethical and Organizational Problems of New Technologies and Information Treatment. Between the two debates is a Coffee break, almost the last chance to talk among participants because after this, the Conference will be closed.

Day 26, Workshop 6: Participation and Governance (Experiences)

Friday morning WS 3: Sustainable Territorial Development Studies

15 papers were presented within this workshop moderated by Dr. Mª José ASENSIO COTO. The room was full this morning. In order to give space for the debate, the Chair asked participants to share four hours instead of two that were initially planned. Papers were organised in two sections. Each one was introduced by a lecture, followed by a report by Mª José ASENSIO of every paper, who gave time to authors to make remarks and comments. After that authors and other participants had time for debate and discussion.First two hours were assigned to papers presenting Action-Research examples with specific case studies. All of them were closely related to territory and focused on development. Conference introducing them was related to the demographic aspects and their impacts in Hungarian region. Issues discussed in the debate were related to industry interweaved in territory, methodology of observation for territorial dynamics, key territorial productive sectors among others.Second part of the session was devoted to papers conceptualising any aspect of Sustainable Development. Framework lecture was focused to the concept of territory introducing the evolution of socioeconomic context determining territorial evolution. Papers discussed had to do with governance within Sustainable Development, factors of competitiveness, and operationalisation of SD at project level proposing a check list, and migrations. Really interesting issues!!!

Day 26, Workshop 1: Territorial Intelligence Approaches

This session was coordinated by Phillippe Dumas, from South Université, France. Session has begun with an introduction of each participant in the workshop. Afterwards, three papers were presented by their respective authors: “Technology’s Transference and Relations between Investigation Units and Enterprises”; “Red para el entendimiento del territorio”; and “Territorial Governance and International Resource”.

Phillipe Dumas has presented five papers. As well as previous ones, they were very well received by the participants. Finally, there was a very interesting debate about the concept of territory which was proposed to be continued at Besançon 2008.

Day 26, Workshop 2

Day 26, last morning: Six different seminar, a lot more of debates…

The morning of the last day of the conference was held in six different Seminar Rooms with their respectives debates. The groups have discussed the following topics: Territorial Intelligence Approaches, Sustainable Territorial Development Studies, General Issues about Participation and Governance, Territorial Analysis Tools, Reflection on Research Action and Experiences of Participation and Governance.

Dr . Dolores Redondo has moderate the Seminar Room: Participation and Governance General Issues) where there have been two exhibitions. The first on a draft of District 5, held by Valdocco. In the second, participants came from France have submitted a project for SMEs. On both projects was carried out a debate. The coordinator of the seminar room did a story on five separate communications from the university sector in general.